Correctness Infrastructure

make your specialist AI trustworthy
with your in-house experts’ judgment,
scaled by AI Agents

Four foundations for trustworthy enterprise AI

Internal standards, made executable

Turn your experts’ tacit judgment, policies, preferences, and exceptions into clear standards your AI systems can be tested against.

More value from scarce expert time

AI agents prepare cases, comparisons and open questions, so your experts spend time only where human judgment materially changes the benchmark.

Benchmark coverage by design

Design what your benchmark should represent from requirements, domain context and existing cases, then fill important gaps with selected or synthesized cases.

Benchmarks that guide development

Carry the same expert-grounded benchmark across model, agent and harness iteration, whether you use Teammately or the development tools your team already trusts.

An impressionist cockatiel in the Australian outback

Generic judges are a starting point. They are not your correctness specification.

Quick start with LLM-judges to check faithfulness, relevancy and toxicity might be a good start for prototypes. Serious enterprises build their own benchmarks by inviting their own experts and defining rubrics at case level.

We help enterprises scale this expert-in-the-loop, at shorter time of scarce experts and higher Return-on-Expert-Effort.

Built for teams engineering AI behavior, not just software around it

Specialist AI needs dedicated infrastructure for shaping behavioral benchmarks, operationalizing internal domain judgment, and carrying those standards into development.

Core platform

Coverage Engineering

Benchmark coverage by design.

Turn requirements, internal materials, and existing cases into a deliberate coverage plan. Agents help reveal missing situations and difficult combinations while your team remains in control.

Core platform

Correctness Elicitation

Make in-house judgment executable.

Use focused comparisons, cases, and conversations to turn specialist judgment, preferences, exceptions, and disagreement into standards your AI systems can be evaluated against.

Built-in engine

Weave

Create the cases and worlds your benchmark needs.

Generate cases, response variants, multimodal artifacts and worlds the agents run from the structured coverage design rather than through undirected synthetic generation, to fulfill and strengthen when your own case pools might miss the challenging facet tuple.

Built-in engine

Trialground

A managed proving ground for harnesses and weights.

Run prototype harnesses and weights against benchmark cases and worlds in isolated managed environments, scale repeatable parallel trials without building bespoke testing infrastructure and combat against agent jailbreaks, and keep responses, trajectories and rubric results connected to the benchmark.

Optional add-on

Coevolve

Explore multiple improvement directions in parallel.

Let evolutionary agents pursue different harness hypotheses, create and test candidates, and continue from stronger branches instead of iterating one change at a time, to better instruct your coding agents on where to patch next based on the benchmark scores. Teammately Coevolve also finds the missing coverage and correctness during its iteration and suggests expert contribution opportunities, so it works as a bridge between human domain experts and coding agents.

Coverage Engineering workspace
Correctness Elicitation workspace
Weave workspace
Trialground workspace
Coevolve workspace

Correctness Infrastructure

Build systems that make domain experts and AI engineers build AI better together

Domain intentStronger AI behavior
01AI team + agents

Coverage Engineering

Design what the benchmark must represent.

ProducesCoverage map
02Domain experts

Correctness Elicitation

Capture policies, exceptions and expert rubrics.

ProducesExecutable standards
03Generation engine

Weave

Construct the cases, variants and worlds.

ProducesChallenge set
04AI engineers

Trialground

Run repeatable trials against the benchmark.

ProducesRubric evidence
05Experts + engineers

Coevolve

Explore stronger branches and missing coverage.

ProducesNext best change

Core platform

Coverage Engineering

Benchmark coverage by design.

Turn requirements, internal materials, and existing cases into a deliberate coverage plan. Agents help reveal missing situations and difficult combinations while your team remains in control.

Coverage Engineering workspace

Core platform

Correctness Elicitation

Make in-house judgment executable.

Use focused comparisons, cases, and conversations to turn specialist judgment, preferences, exceptions, and disagreement into standards your AI systems can be evaluated against.

Correctness Elicitation workspace

Built-in engine

Weave

Create the cases and worlds your benchmark needs.

Generate cases, response variants, multimodal artifacts and worlds the agents run from the structured coverage design rather than through undirected synthetic generation, to fulfill and strengthen when your own case pools might miss the challenging facet tuple.

Weave workspace

Built-in engine

Trialground

A managed proving ground for harnesses and weights.

Run prototype harnesses and weights against benchmark cases and worlds in isolated managed environments, scale repeatable parallel trials without building bespoke testing infrastructure and combat against agent jailbreaks, and keep responses, trajectories and rubric results connected to the benchmark.

Trialground workspace

Optional add-on

Coevolve

Explore multiple improvement directions in parallel.

Let evolutionary agents pursue different harness hypotheses, create and test candidates, and continue from stronger branches instead of iterating one change at a time, to better instruct your coding agents on where to patch next based on the benchmark scores. Teammately Coevolve also finds the missing coverage and correctness during its iteration and suggests expert contribution opportunities, so it works as a bridge between human domain experts and coding agents.

Coevolve workspace

Correctness Infrastructure

Build systems that make domain experts and AI engineers build AI better together

Domain intentStronger AI behavior
01AI team + agents

Coverage Engineering

Design what the benchmark must represent.

ProducesCoverage map
02Domain experts

Correctness Elicitation

Capture policies, exceptions and expert rubrics.

ProducesExecutable standards
03Generation engine

Weave

Construct the cases, variants and worlds.

ProducesChallenge set
04AI engineers

Trialground

Run repeatable trials against the benchmark.

ProducesRubric evidence
05Experts + engineers

Coevolve

Explore stronger branches and missing coverage.

ProducesNext best change

Increase the return on every hour of expert effort

Scale the impact of internal experts without scaling manual annotation work.

Your most valuable experts should not become full-time annotators. Teammately prepares the coverage structure, cases, candidate responses, possible policies, and unresolved conflicts before asking for their judgment.

Experts spend time on the decisions only they can make. Each contribution is then reused across benchmark coverage, policies, binary rubrics, evaluations, and improvement.

Research

We’re researching a modern solution to alignment between AI behavior and human intent

An impressionist cockatiel in a garden

Correctness specifications

Expert-grounded correctness

Methods for translating specialist judgment, policies and preferences into precise evaluation criteria for AI systems.

Explore research
An impressionist cockatiel in the Australian outback

Benchmark coverage

Coverage design for agent behavior

Approaches for discovering representative cases, meaningful edge conditions and the gaps that matter before development scales.

Explore research
An impressionist cockatiel in a snowy landscape

Alignment systems

Human–AI learning loops

How experts and AI agents can continuously refine policies, rubrics and benchmarks while preserving human intent.

Explore research
An impressionist cockatiel at sunset

Governance

Judgment that stays auditable

Research into retaining expert rationale, confidence and decision history as AI behavior evolves.

Explore research
See more research

Built around your judgment

Make expert judgment part of every AI development decision.

Bring domain specialists and AI engineers into one correctness workflow—from benchmark design to every development decision.