Teammately Docs
Docs menu

concept

Coverage Management

Manage benchmark coverage from setup through representation, Coverage Stories, case review, Case Foundry, and contribution requests.

Coverage Management

Coverage Management is the benchmark-scoped workspace for deciding whether the current dataset represents the behavior space the benchmark is meant to test. It connects project Coverage Facets to dataset representation, coverage guidance, Coverage Stories, case preparation, and expert contribution requests.

Definition

Project Coverage Facets define reusable Dimensions, Project Topics, and Case Construction Patterns. Coverage Management applies those foundations to one benchmark. Get Started establishes benchmark coverage guidance. The overview shows representation and operational status. Coverage Stories organize meaningful slices or gaps. Case Review inspects prepared cases and materials. Case Foundry coordinates case construction work.

The goal is to make missing or thin behavior explicit before evaluation evidence is trusted. Coverage Management does not replace Benchmark Datasets; it explains and improves the representation of the selected data.

Decision checkpoint

ObservationUseNext durable result
Benchmark purpose or guidance is missingGet StartedSaved coverage setup and readiness
A facet tuple is thin or absentRepresentation and Coverage StoriesNamed coverage need and intended evidence
More cases are neededCase FoundryBounded construction work tied to the gap
Generated cases may be unclearCase ReviewReviewed case and material quality
Specialist judgment is requiredContribution request from coverage contextBenchmark-scoped Expert Contribution
Coverage changed materiallyBenchmark DatasetsUpdated selection and snapshot boundary

Coverage Stories and case work

A Coverage Story gives a gap or behavior slice an operational narrative: why it matters, which facet combinations define it, what evidence exists, and what sourcing work remains. It should be concrete enough to guide case construction and expert attention.

Case Foundry can prepare case work from that structure. Case Review checks the resulting inputs and generated materials before they enter trusted dataset evidence. AI assistance can accelerate preparation, but selection and benchmark interpretation remain explicit human and product-state decisions.

Coverage and correctness

Coverage gaps sometimes reveal missing correctness rather than missing cases. If experts cannot say how a represented situation should be judged, request an Expert Contribution and update policies or rubrics. If the standard is clear but no case exercises it, use Weave and Case Foundry. If cases exist but are not selected or snapshotted, use Benchmark Datasets.

This routing prevents Comparison Directions, Contribution-scoped agent behavior, and coverage structure from being mixed together. Comparison Directions guide response variation; Coverage Facets and Coverage Stories describe the benchmark behavior space.

Worked example

Conflicting-source story

Representation shows that the benchmark covers current-source questions but almost never combines them with a plausible superseded document. A Coverage Story names the conflict pattern, relevant source-freshness and impact facets, and the desired case count. Case Foundry prepares candidates, Case Review rejects unrealistic material, and the accepted cases enter a new dataset snapshot.

Source confidence

Code-backed: the active benchmark coverage routes expose setup, overview, Coverage Stories, Case Review, Case Foundry integration, realtime state, and contribution-request entry points.

Found something unclear?

Report outdated, unsupported, or confusing docs so we can fix the source page.

Report a docs issue

Continue learning

Related docs

AI context