Curate and correct outputs
Use a concrete answer to explain the requirement behind acceptance, rejection, or correction.
Prerequisites
The assigned Contribution includes the Case, candidate output, relevant materials, and an output-review activity.
Steps
- Read the input and source material before judging the answer.
- Use the provided curation or correction controls to record the answer you would stand behind. Explain which claim, omission, or qualification changes your judgment.
- Describe when the same answer would be acceptable under different conditions. Return unresolved source questions to Lemon instead of inventing missing context.
- Review any proposed policy or rubric against your actual reasoning before recording its artifact decision.
Object and state changes
The response and rationale belong to the Contribution. A corrected example and a proposed standard retain their separate artifact states.
Success criteria
Another reviewer can distinguish the expected answer from the general requirement it illustrates.
Common failure modes
Accepting a plausible answer without checking controlling sources; treating one corrected answer as an approved universal rule.