---
id: benchmark-datasets.cases
title: Benchmark Dataset Cases
summary: Inspect benchmark Case membership, coverage traces, references, and scoped bulk actions.
kind: task
product_area: benchmark_datasets
status: stable
updated: 2026-08-22
canonical: /docs/benchmark-datasets/cases
---

# Benchmark Dataset Cases

## Prerequisites

- A selected benchmark and permission to inspect or manage its current dataset.
- Project Cases that conform to the intended Input Schema.

The Cases tab is the benchmark-scoped view of the current editable case set. It shows Case content and membership together with coverage trace, output or reference mapping, and evaluator relationships.

Select one or more rows to request an Expert Contribution, create another benchmark from the selection, remove the Cases from the current benchmark, or download them. Removal changes current membership; it does not delete the reusable Case from project Assets or mutate an existing Snapshot.

## Review before snapshotting

1. Confirm each Case still conforms to Project Input Schema and has the intended materials.
2. Inspect Coverage Facet assignments and source or contributor provenance.
3. Check policy and rubric application, including whether eligible evaluator links are approved.
4. Resolve missing or ambiguous output/reference mapping when the workflow requires reference outputs.
5. Use Representation to check whether the set supports the intended claim.

> Membership is not evidence yet
>
> The editable Cases tab can change. Use a Dataset Snapshot and Benchmark Version when an evaluation, comparison, or Improvement Session must remain reproducible.

## After changing membership

Open Representation and confirm that the change affected the intended facet or evaluator population. Removing redundant Cases can improve balance even when total Case count falls. Adding many near-duplicates can increase count without adding meaningful coverage.

If a selected Case needs content correction, edit it through the owning Case workflow and review every future benchmark that selects it. Existing Snapshots stay unchanged. If the Case reveals an unclear standard, request an Expert Contribution before compensating with more examples.

{% example-demo title="Example: scoped bulk action" %}
An operator selects five Cases tied to an unresolved exception and requests one Expert Contribution. The Cases remain in the current set while the expert works. After the controlling Rubric is clarified, the team reviews membership and creates a new Snapshot with the approved evaluator links.
{% /example-demo %}

## Object and state changes

Selected-row removal changes current benchmark membership; creating another benchmark creates a separate benchmark; requesting a Contribution creates scoped expert work. Downloads and inspection are read-only. No action here mutates an existing Snapshot.

## Success criteria

- Current membership, Case identity, coverage trace, and evaluator relationships are understood.
- Any bulk action affects only the intended selected Cases.
- A new Snapshot is created when changed membership must become evaluation evidence.

## Common failure modes

- Treating removal from the benchmark as project-level Case deletion.
- Assuming editable membership changed an old Benchmark Version.
- Selecting Cases by visible text while ignoring their durable IDs.

## Related reference pages

{% related-card-grid title="Related reference pages" %}
- [Benchmark Datasets](/docs/benchmark-datasets)
- [Cases](/docs/assets/cases)
- [Project Input Schema](/docs/project-settings/input-schema)
{% /related-card-grid %}

## Related troubleshooting pages

{% related-card-grid title="Related troubleshooting pages" %}
- [Dataset upload](/docs/troubleshooting/dataset-upload)
- [Unclear Cases](/docs/troubleshooting/unclear-cases)
- [Unbalanced coverage](/docs/troubleshooting/unbalanced-coverage)
{% /related-card-grid %}

## Source confidence

Code-backed: the active Cases route defines the benchmark membership table, coverage trace, selected-row operations, downloads, and output/reference presentation.
