{"query":"Review Screens","corpusVersion":"local","generatedAt":"2026-09-13T04:40:08.244Z","results":[{"blockId":"assets.review-screens#review-screens","pageId":"assets.review-screens","title":"Review Screens","pageTitle":"Review Screens","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens#review-screens","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","sectionId":"review-screens","kind":"reference","productArea":"assets","score":1149.913977421319,"reasons":["search_match","title_match","display_title_match","term_match"],"markdown":"# Review Screens"},{"blockId":"assets.review-screens#source-confidence","pageId":"assets.review-screens","title":"Source confidence","pageTitle":"Review Screens","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens#source-confidence","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","sectionId":"source-confidence","kind":"reference","productArea":"assets","score":370.14930373098707,"reasons":["search_match","page_title_match","term_match","prefix_or_fuzzy_match"],"markdown":"## Source confidence\n\nCode-backed: the active Review Screens library and detail routes provide paginated browsing, usage filtering, creation, editing, preview, and screen-authoring controls. The stable responsibility boundary is documented here without claiming every visual control is permanent."},{"blockId":"assets.review-screens#definition","pageId":"assets.review-screens","title":"Definition","pageTitle":"Review Screens","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens#definition","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","sectionId":"definition","kind":"reference","productArea":"assets","score":369.07300093890854,"reasons":["search_match","page_title_match","term_match","prefix_or_fuzzy_match"],"markdown":"## Definition\n\nReview Screens are reusable project Assets for designing how experts see Case context and Contribution questions. A screen can present selected inputs, Case materials, Dimensions, candidate outputs, and review controls in a consistent layout.\n\nReview Screens control presentation. They do not change Case content, the Contribution objective, Policy meaning, Rubric semantics, or expert authority."},{"blockId":"assets.review-screens#fields-states-or-lifecycle-rules","pageId":"assets.review-screens","title":"Fields, states, or lifecycle rules","pageTitle":"Review Screens","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens#fields-states-or-lifecycle-rules","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","sectionId":"fields-states-or-lifecycle-rules","kind":"reference","productArea":"assets","score":365.9997924778745,"reasons":["search_match","page_title_match","term_match","prefix_or_fuzzy_match"],"markdown":"## Fields, states, or lifecycle rules\n\n- The library is available at **Assets → Review Screens**.\n- A screen has a project-owned identity and can be opened in the visual designer for editing and preview.\n- The designer can use current Dimensions, context keys, and declared Project Input Schema material fields as presentation inputs.\n- A screen can be selected for Contribution work; the Contribution still supplies the benchmark-specific objective, expert, Cases, attachments, and task components.\n- Creating or editing a screen affects future presentation. It does not rewrite completed responses, Checkpoints, or historical Contribution evidence.\n- A visible field is not automatically required by Project Input Schema, and a required Case material is not automatically appropriate for every screen."},{"blockId":"assets.review-screens#designing-for-judgment","pageId":"assets.review-screens","title":"Designing for judgment","pageTitle":"Review Screens","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens#designing-for-judgment","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","sectionId":"designing-for-judgment","kind":"reference","productArea":"assets","score":365.85387369791925,"reasons":["search_match","page_title_match","term_match","prefix_or_fuzzy_match"],"markdown":"## Designing for judgment\n\nShow the smallest context set that lets an expert make and explain the requested decision. Include source conflicts, Case materials, candidate responses, and relevant coverage dimensions when they affect correctness. Keep administrative metadata and unrelated fields out of the primary judgment surface.\n\nTest a screen against representative and boundary Cases before using it for broad Contribution work. If an expert must rely on private knowledge or locate a missing source, correct Project Context, Reference Materials, the Case, or the Contribution before changing the layout.\n\n![Review Screen visual designer with a Case preview and configurable question, body, and context panels.](/docs-assets/assets/screenshots/reviewer-screen-designer-demo.png)\n\nPreview the expert-facing Case and question layout with representative data before using it in a Contribution.\n\n{% example-demo title=\"Example: source-grounding screen\" %}\nFor a grounding Contribution, the screen displays the user request, candidate response, current source document, superseded source document, and source-freshness Dimension. It omits internal ingestion metadata so the expert can compare the response with both documents and explain which source controls.\n{% /example-demo %}"},{"blockId":"assets.review-screens#related-task-pages","pageId":"assets.review-screens","title":"Related task pages","pageTitle":"Review Screens","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens#related-task-pages","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/assets/review-screens.md","sectionId":"related-task-pages","kind":"reference","productArea":"assets","score":335.03450749917533,"reasons":["search_match","page_title_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## Related task pages\n\n{% related-card-grid title=\"Related task pages\" %}\n- [Assets](/docs/assets)\n- [Configure Project Input Schema](/docs/project-settings/input-schema)\n- [Request an Expert Contribution](/docs/expert-contributions/request-contribution)\n{% /related-card-grid %}"},{"blockId":"coverage-management.case-review#case-review","pageId":"coverage-management.case-review","title":"Case Review","pageTitle":"Case Review","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/coverage-management/case-review.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/coverage-management/case-review#case-review","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/coverage-management/case-review.md","sectionId":"case-review","kind":"task","productArea":"coverage_management","score":176.6259882547153,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"# Case Review"},{"blockId":"coverage-management.case-review#review-candidates","pageId":"coverage-management.case-review","title":"Review candidates","pageTitle":"Case Review","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/coverage-management/case-review.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/coverage-management/case-review#review-candidates","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/coverage-management/case-review.md","sectionId":"review-candidates","kind":"task","productArea":"coverage_management","score":176.00068912890168,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## Review candidates\n\nCandidates begin included for review. Remove a candidate when it is weak, redundant, misplaced, unsupported, or does not prove its tuple. Inspect its fit explanation, source and facet trace, input content, materials, and relationship to the tuple target. Inclusion should mean the candidate is suitable to enter the current benchmark set, not merely that generation succeeded.\n\nFor one tuple, **Generate more** appends candidates using count and operator instructions. **Regenerate** can reuse or synthesize source evidence, or run in synthesize-only mode. These actions have different provenance implications; preserve the displayed source relationship when deciding which candidate to keep."}]}