{"query":"Correctness Governance","corpusVersion":"local","generatedAt":"2026-09-13T04:35:33.338Z","results":[{"blockId":"correctness.overview#correctness-governance","pageId":"correctness.overview","title":"Correctness Governance","pageTitle":"Correctness Governance","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/correctness-governance.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/correctness-governance#correctness-governance","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/correctness-governance.md","sectionId":"correctness-governance","kind":"concept","productArea":"correctness_governance","score":980.1600840117418,"reasons":["search_match","title_match","display_title_match","term_match"],"markdown":"# Correctness Governance\n\nCorrectness Governance is the project-level surface for policies and rubrics. It makes the specialist standards used by expert work and benchmark evaluation inspectable, attributable, and reusable across benchmark workspaces."},{"blockId":"governance.overview#governance-overview","pageId":"governance.overview","title":"Governance Overview","pageTitle":"Governance Overview","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance#governance-overview","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","sectionId":"governance-overview","kind":"concept","productArea":"governance","score":556.7831519463315,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"# Governance Overview\n\nUse Governance when the reader needs to know whether correctness evidence is accountable: who approved it, which version was used, whether it is stale, and whether the user has the right access to act."},{"blockId":"governance.overview#what-governance-protects","pageId":"governance.overview","title":"What governance protects","pageTitle":"Governance Overview","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance#what-governance-protects","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","sectionId":"what-governance-protects","kind":"concept","productArea":"governance","score":512.0862937327915,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## What governance protects\n\nGovernance protects the line between suggestion and approval. AI assistance can draft, classify, summarize, or propose changes, but a suggestion becomes a governed standard only through the owning artifact's accountable approval state. Governance also protects version boundaries: a benchmark result is interpretable only when the Case set, governed evaluators, saved Harness Version, settings, published Regime Version, and benchmark-level run fields are clear.\n\nWhen a benchmark changes unexpectedly, Governance asks which artifact changed. When experts disagree, it asks how the decision was resolved. When a reviewer lacks access, it asks whether the user is a project participant, reviewer, workspace member, or organization administrator. These distinctions keep the product trustworthy without inventing unsupported enterprise claims.\n\nBefore using a result in human review, inspect approval, version, access, staleness, and source-confidence boundaries. Hold the interpretation when any required boundary is unknown."},{"blockId":"governance.overview#what-this-area-is","pageId":"governance.overview","title":"What this area is","pageTitle":"Governance Overview","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance#what-this-area-is","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","sectionId":"what-this-area-is","kind":"concept","productArea":"governance","score":430.20435538605955,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## What this area is\n\nGovernance covers human approval boundaries, versioning, staleness, reviewer activity, project access, roles, permissions, conflict resolution, reproducibility, and data-handling expectations for AI-assisted features. It is about the correctness artifact graph: who approved what, which version was used, when an artifact became stale, and what context is needed to repeat or explain a benchmark result.\n\nThis page does not promise compliance, retention, billing, deployment, tenant-isolation, or security guarantees beyond the code-backed product surfaces cited in the source refs. Use the Admin Console page for organization administration and the permissions references for exact access boundaries where they are source-backed."},{"blockId":"governance.overview#governance-readiness-check","pageId":"governance.overview","title":"Governance readiness check","pageTitle":"Governance Overview","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance#governance-readiness-check","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","sectionId":"governance-readiness-check","kind":"concept","productArea":"governance","score":413.4302441866552,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## Governance readiness check\n\n| Evidence is ready for accountable review when... | Hold the decision when... |\n| --- | --- |\n| Approved policies and rubrics are separated from suggestions and drafts. | Any governing standard is unapproved, stale, or ambiguous. |\n| Benchmark evidence names case, standard, benchmark, run, and candidate versions. | A score is detached from version boundaries. |\n| Access and reviewer roles are checked against source-backed permission pages. | A role label is used as a permission guarantee. |\n| Unsupported enterprise claims are left out or routed to source-backed docs. | The page implies compliance, retention, security, billing, or deployment behavior without evidence. |"},{"blockId":"project-settings.overview#relationship-to-governance","pageId":"project-settings.overview","title":"Relationship to governance","pageTitle":"Project Settings","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/project-settings.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/project-settings#relationship-to-governance","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/project-settings.md","sectionId":"relationship-to-governance","kind":"concept","productArea":"project_settings","score":344.72209202392946,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## Relationship to governance\n\nWorkspace administration controls the wider account boundary. Correctness Governance owns Policies and Rubrics. Project Settings should therefore express project contracts and access, not become a catch-all place for evaluator rules, secret values, or informal candidate configuration.\n\n{% related-card-grid title=\"Project settings\" %}\n- [General settings](/docs/project-settings/general)\n- [Regime settings](/docs/project-settings/regime)\n- [Project Input Schema](/docs/project-settings/input-schema)\n- [Project Members](/docs/project-settings/project-members)\n{% /related-card-grid %}\n\n{% related-card-grid title=\"Connected workspaces\" %}\n- [Agent Setup](/docs/agent-setup)\n- [Assets](/docs/assets)\n- [Benchmark Datasets](/docs/benchmark-datasets)\n{% /related-card-grid %}"},{"blockId":"governance.conflict-resolution#resolve-conflicting-correctness-evidence","pageId":"governance.conflict-resolution","title":"Resolve conflicting correctness evidence","pageTitle":"Resolve conflicting correctness evidence","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance/conflict-resolution.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance/conflict-resolution#resolve-conflicting-correctness-evidence","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance/conflict-resolution.md","sectionId":"resolve-conflicting-correctness-evidence","kind":"task","productArea":"governance","score":324.9175037784719,"reasons":["search_match","term_match","prefix_or_fuzzy_match"],"markdown":"# Resolve conflicting correctness evidence"},{"blockId":"governance.overview#decision-checkpoint","pageId":"governance.overview","title":"Decision checkpoint","pageTitle":"Governance Overview","url":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","humanUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance#decision-checkpoint","markdownUrl":"https://teammately.ai/docs/governance.md","sectionId":"decision-checkpoint","kind":"concept","productArea":"governance","score":318.87539291528964,"reasons":["search_match","term_match"],"markdown":"## Decision checkpoint\n\n| Governance question | Inspect | Do not infer |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Can this standard govern evidence? | Human approval boundary | Suggested or AI-drafted text is approved. |\n| Why did evidence change? | Case, policy, rubric, benchmark, and run versions | Score movement is only candidate behavior. |\n| Who can act? | Project access, reviewer access, and admin references | Role label equals permission. |\n| Is the artifact stale? | Staleness and versioning pages | Old benchmark evidence still reflects current standards. |\n| Is this an enterprise trust claim? | Source-backed admin/security docs | Compliance, retention, or deployment guarantees. |"}]}